96 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
|||
|
|
name: web-research
|
|||
|
|
description: 結構化網路搜尋策略。提供各場景的搜尋關鍵字模板、結果整理方法、來源可信度評估框架。
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Web Research Skill
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
提供系統化的網路搜尋策略，讓 Agent 能高效地從公開資訊中取得有價值的數據和洞察。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 搜尋策略模板
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 市場規模搜尋
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] market size [當前年份] [下一年份]
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] industry report
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] growth rate statistics
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] TAM SAM SOM
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] market forecast
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 競品搜尋
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] alternatives [當前年份]
|
|||
|
|
best [產品類別] tools [當前年份]
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] pricing features review
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] vs [競品名稱]
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] changelog [當前年份]
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 用戶聲音搜尋
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] frustrations complaints site:reddit.com
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] negative review site:reddit.com OR site:news.ycombinator.com
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] "I hate" OR "annoying" OR "wish it could" [當前年份]
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] 1 star review
|
|||
|
|
[目標用戶族群] biggest problems with [產品類別]
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] why I switched from
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 使用體驗搜尋
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] onboarding experience review
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] UX review [當前年份]
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] tutorial getting started
|
|||
|
|
[競品名稱] user experience walkthrough
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 技術趨勢搜尋
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
[技術領域] trends [當前年份]
|
|||
|
|
[技術領域] adoption rate statistics
|
|||
|
|
[產品類別] technology stack
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 搜尋結果整理方法
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
搜尋結果必須按以下格式整理：
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 數據型結果
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
| 數據點 | 數值 | 來源 | 可信度 | 日期 |
|
|||
|
|
|--------|------|------|--------|------|
|
|||
|
|
| [指標] | [數字] | [來源名+URL] | 高/中/低 | [年份] |
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 觀點型結果
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
| 觀點摘要 | 原文引用 | 來源平台 | URL |
|
|||
|
|
|----------|---------|---------|-----|
|
|||
|
|
| [一句話摘要] | 「[原文]」 | [Reddit/HN/...] | [URL] |
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 來源可信度評估
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| 來源類型 | 可信度 | 說明 |
|
|||
|
|
|---------|--------|------|
|
|||
|
|
| 產業報告（Gartner、Statista） | 高 | 數據可直接引用 |
|
|||
|
|
| 上市公司財報 | 高 | 數據可直接引用 |
|
|||
|
|
| 主流科技媒體 | 中-高 | 趨勢觀點可參考，數字需交叉驗證 |
|
|||
|
|
| Reddit / HN 討論 | 中 | 用戶痛點可參考，數字不可信 |
|
|||
|
|
| 個人部落格 | 低-中 | 僅作為佐證，不作為主要來源 |
|
|||
|
|
| 無法判斷的來源 | 低 | 必須標明「來源待驗證」 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 注意事項
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- 每次搜尋至少執行 **6 次不同關鍵字組合**
|
|||
|
|
- 找不到精確數字時，提供有根據的估算並標明「估算」
|
|||
|
|
- 優先引用近 2 年內的數據
|
|||
|
|
- 不要捏造數據，找不到就如實說明
|
|||
|
|
- 搜尋結果與原始 URL 必須一併記錄
|